4.5 Article

Available and total phosphorus background levels in soils: a calcareous and semi-arid region

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-023-11175-z

关键词

Environmental monitoring; Phosphorus extractants; Soil contamination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is important to evaluate the risk of element pollution in soils by understanding their background levels. This study calculated the background levels of available and total phosphorus in agricultural soils. The results showed that using these background levels for phosphorus would enable accurate assessment of excess phosphorus resulting from human activities.
It is critical to understand the risk of element pollution in soils by evaluating their background levels. Phosphorus (P) content in agricultural soils needs to be assessed from agronomic and environmental standpoints. The current study intended to calculate the background levels of available and total P in soils. To achieve this goal, 50 sites without human activities were selected. Soils were sampled from the surface and subsurface of each site (100 soil samples). The available P forms in soils were extracted using the water-extractable P (WEP), calcium chloride-extractable P (CCEP), and Olsen-extractable P (OEP) methods. The first two extractants are being used to evaluate P leaching from soils, while the last one is being used as an agronomic indicator. The methods used to calculate background levels were the iterative 2-delta technique (2-delta) and the calculated distribution function (CDF). Results showed that the upper limits of background levels using 2-delta method were 1.45, 0.92, 8.12, and 424.4 mg kg(-1) for WEP, CCEP, OEP, and total P, respectively. Also, the upper limits of background levels using CDF method were 1.42, 1.15, 12.09, and 447.6 mg kg(-1), for WEP, CCEP, OEP, and total P, respectively. It can be concluded that using these background levels, which for the first time were calculated for P, would enable us to have an accurate examination of P excess as a result of human activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据