4.3 Article

From social networks to bird enthusiasts: reporting interactions between plastic waste and birds in Peru

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S037689292300005X

关键词

birds; Peru; plastic waste; pollution; social media

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peru is home to a wide variety of bird species, but little is known about their interactions with plastic waste. In order to address this knowledge gap, the researchers conducted a comprehensive search of scientific literature, collected data from social media platforms and databases, and reached out to experts and bird enthusiasts. The study identified 119 instances of bird interactions with plastic debris, involving 39 different species from 20 families. The red-legged cormorant and the neotropical cormorant were found to be the most affected species. The researchers recommend further investigation, as there may be additional species that interact with plastic waste that have not yet been documented.
Peru has the second-highest diversity of birds in the world, but little is known about the interactions between birds and plastic waste. To fill this knowledge gap, we searched the scientific literature, collected information from social networks such as Facebook and databases such as Macaulay Library and iNaturalist and solicited records through messaging with researchers and bird enthusiasts. We found 119 bird interactions with plastic debris involving 39 species from 20 families, with the red-legged cormorant Phalacrocorax gaimardi and the neotropical cormorant Phalacrocorax brasilianus being the most affected species. By type of interaction category, plastic waste in nests was the most abundant, followed by entanglement, capture and handling and ingestion. Ropes, nets and soft plastics such as bags were the most frequently reported types of waste. As our methodology has limitations, it is probable that other species that also interact with plastic waste have not been reported, so we recommend further study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据