4.7 Review

Bioleaching metal-bearing wastes and by-products for resource recovery: a review

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 3329-3350

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10311-023-01611-4

关键词

Bioleaching; Biohydrometallurgy; Biomining; Metal bearing material; Electronic waste; Multivariate optimisation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The global transition to a circular economy requires research and development of technologies for sustainable resource recovery. Bioleaching, using microorganisms to extract metals from unwanted materials, is an eco-friendly and cost-effective alternative. Optimizing the process parameters can enhance yields and promote wider application of bioleaching.
The global transition to a circular economy calls for research and development on technologies facilitating sustainable resource recovery from wastes and by-products. Metal-bearing materials, including electronic wastes, tailings, and metallurgical by-products, are increasingly viewed as valuable resources, with some possessing comparable or superior quality to natural ores. Bioleaching, an eco-friendly and cost-effective alternative to conventional hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical methods, uses microorganisms and their metabolites to extract metals from unwanted metal-bearing materials. The performance of bioleaching is influenced by pH, solid concentration, energy source, agitation rate, irrigation rate, aeration rate, and inoculum concentration. Optimizing these parameters improves yields and encourages the wider application of bioleaching. Here, we review the microbial diversity and specific mechanisms of bioleaching for metal recovery. We describe the current operations and approaches of bioleaching at various scales and summarise the influence of a broad range of operational parameters. Finally, we address the primary challenges in scaling up bioleaching applications and propose an optimisation strategy for future bioleaching research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据