4.7 Article

Load-control vs. displacement-control strategy in fatigue threshold analysis of adhesives: Effects of temperature

期刊

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
卷 284, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109255

关键词

Fatigue fracture; Polyurethane; Fatigue threshold; Temperature; Mode I

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rate of fatigue crack growth and fatigue threshold energy release rate are crucial parameters for designing adhesive joints for fatigue service. Different testing strategies, constant load control and constant displacement control, can be used to obtain these parameters through fatigue fracture tests. The effect of testing methodology and temperature on the fatigue behavior of adhesives was investigated for a structural polyurethane adhesive used in automotive applications.
For the design of adhesive joints for service in fatigue, parameters such as the rate of fatigue crack growth and the fatigue threshold energy release rate are of extreme importance. These parameters can be obtained through fatigue fracture tests using different strategies, namely Constant load control and constant displacement control. Despite the extensive studies conducted on the fatigue performance of bonded joints, the role of testing methodology on the fatigue fracture behaviour of adhesives is less considered, especially in conjunction with the effect of temperature in these tests. Accordingly, in this study, a structural polyurethane adhesive suitable for automotive applications is characterized in terms of its fatigue behaviour in pure mode I using DCB (double cantilever beam) specimens. Fatigue tests were performed at different temperatures under both constant load control and constant displacement control conditions. A compliance-based method was used to measure the crack size throughout tests. The threshold energy release rate was calculated for different test temperatures and the two testing strategies were compared. It was seen that a constant displacement control methodology is superior to a constant load control methodology when testing for the threshold energy release rate, due to its shorter duration and low sensitivity to initial testing conditions. Differences observed between fatigue testing methodologies were exacerbated by the effect of temperature on the adhesive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据