4.6 Article

Numerical assessment of the multi-phase nanofluid flow inside a microchannel during the melting and solidification of PCM in the thermal management of a heatsink

期刊

ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 267-278

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2022.12.038

关键词

Heatsink; Square pin-fin; Multi-phase nanofluid; PCM; Numerical study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a numerical simulation of a heatsink with a large number of square pin-fins using the finite element method. The two-phase mixture method is employed to simulate the nanofluid flow. The results show that an increment in the Reynolds number reduces the temperature of the nanofluid exiting the heatsink significantly, while increasing the volume fraction of nanoparticles slightly decreases it.
This article presents a numerical simulation of a heatsink with a large number of square pin-fins using the finite element method. A nanofluid passes helical microchannel that is placed inside the heatsink. The two-phase mixture method is employed to simulate the nanofluid flow. The space between the pin-fins and the micro channel in the heatsink is filled with phase change material (PCM). The values of the heatsink temperature (T HK), including the maximum and average temperature, the temperature of the nanofluid (T-NF) exiting the heatsink, the molten PCM fraction, and the heat transfer coefficient (HTC) are estimated by changing the Reynolds number (Re) ranging from 100 to 500 and the volume fraction of nanoparticles (9) varying from 0 to 3% up to 500 s. The results demonstrate that an increment in the Re reduces the T-NF exiting the heatsink significantly; however, enhancing the amount of 9 decreases it slightly. In 500 s and 250 s, an enhancement in the Re from 100 to 500 intensifies the maximum T-HK by 17.28 and 9.92 degrees C, respectively. At Re = 100, 200, and 300, the PCM melting process starts in approximately 150, 200, and 250 s, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据