4.6 Article

Examine the lattice Boltzmann method for the mixed convection simulation of water/Al2O3 nanofluid in a 2D rectangular cavity under radiation with isothermal semicircular obstacles

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2023.01.009

关键词

Lattice Boltzmann method; Nanofluid mixed convection; Magnetic field; Radiation; Fin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study simulated the mixed convection of water/Al2O3 nanofluid in a two-dimensional rectangular cavity with the presence of radiation. The effects of magnetic field, cavity height, and radiation parameter on heat transfer and fluid rotation were analyzed. The results showed that the incorporation of radiation reversed the flow rotation and increased the Nu on the wall. The cavity height and magnetic field had significant effects on Nu at different conditions.
The present study simulated the mixed convection (MCXN) of the water/Al2O3 nanofluid (NFs) in a two-dimensional rectangular cavity in the presence of radiation. The top and bottom walls were assumed to be cold and hot, respectively, with the lateral walls being insulated. A magnetic field (MGF) with a Hartmann number (Ha) of 0-40 was applied to the NFs within the cavity. The simulations were carried out at a Richardson number (Ri) of 1 and a Rayleigh number (Ra) of 105 for cavity heights of 0.5-2.0 to evaluate heat transfer (HTF) on the walls and analyze fluid rotation within the cavity. The lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) was used to perform the simulations. It was found that the incorporation of radiation into the system reversed the flow rotation in the cavity and increased the Nu. A rise in the radiation parameter from 0 to 0.2 led to a 2.8-fold larger Nu on the cold wall. A rise in the cavity height decreased the Nu, and a further increase in the height increased the Nu on the wall. An increased Ha had an insignificant effect on the Nu at small cavity heights but decreased the Nu on the wall at large cavity heights.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据