4.7 Review

A Mini-Review on Underground Hydrogen Storage: Production to Field Studies

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 37, 期 12, 页码 8128-8141

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c00841

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen is increasingly being recognized as an alternative fuel to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Storing hydrogen in geological structures is a promising technology for efficient and large-scale storage. This review article provides an overview of underground hydrogen storage, including hydrogen production methods, storage techniques, and factors influencing storage. It also presents field studies and discusses challenges and future prospects. The article serves as a valuable resource for researchers and industry professionals interested in underground hydrogen storage.
Hydrogen has become increasingly popular as one of thealternativefuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Storing hydrogen in geologicalstructures is a technology that shows great potential in storing largeamounts of hydrogen efficiently. However, this technology is relativelynew and requires a clear understanding. Therefore, a quick reviewof underground hydrogen storage is needed to understand its fundamentalconcepts. This review article presents important components relevantto underground hydrogen storage. First, some currently available hydrogenproduction methods are discussed followed by hydrogen storage methods.Both small-scale and large-scale hydrogen storage methods are presented.Next, some important factors (fluid properties, rock properties, solid-fluidinteractions, and chemical interactions) influencing underground hydrogenstorage are summarized. This is followed by presenting various interestingfield studies for underground hydrogen storage. Lastly, some challengesand future outlooks pertinent to underground hydrogen storage arereviewed. This article will serve as a useful resource that providesa quick overview of underground hydrogen storage for both researchersand industrialists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据