4.7 Article

Thermal analysis of micro-encapsulated phase change material (MEPCM)-based units integrated into a commercial water tank for cold thermal energy storage

期刊

ENERGY
卷 266, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126479

关键词

Micro-encapsulated phase change material; Cold thermal energy storage; Experimental tests; Numerical analysis; MEPCM water Tank

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a numerical analysis of a hybrid latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) system using micro-encapsulated phase change material (MEPCM) in cylindrical modules integrated into a water tank, aiming to enhance storage efficiency and reduce energy usage of a water-chiller system.
This paper presents a numerical analysis of a hybrid latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) based on a water slurry of micro-encapsulated phase change material (MEPCM) inside cylindrical modules integrated into a commercial water tank. The aim is to enhance its storage efficiency to reduce the energy usage of a water-chiller system, which provides cooling for a 150 m2 single-family house. Firstly, a 2D axial-symmetric model of a cy-lindrical unit with MEPCM-water slurry is developed to investigate charging/discharging processes. Numerical solutions for temperature profiles are then experimentally validated using a thermal chamber. Further, a 1D code for the water-side heat transfer simulation is developed and coupled with the previous one to perform the simulation of the whole storage system. Effects of varying cylindrical modules size and water inlet temperature are investigated. According to the results, a reduction of 2 degrees C in water temperature involves a 16% increase in energy stored, i.e., from 1.9 to 2.2 kWh, but simultaneously does not entail a global benefit, since the energy released is lower than the baseline, i.e., 0.6 kWh. In periodic conditions, the best solution in the module size, i.e., 1 L, ensures a contribution for the chiller system of about 0.75 kWh/day.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据