4.7 Article

Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of cogeneration energy hubs at Japanese paper mills with thermal energy storage

期刊

ENERGY
卷 270, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.126886

关键词

Life cycle assessment; Dispatchable power source; Paper production; Power selling; District heating

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To accelerate renewable energy implementation, we evaluated the potentials of paper mills installing wind energy as energy hubs. By analyzing the energy flows and emissions, we found that most paper mills could reduce greenhouse gas using thermal energy storage, wind energy, and woody biomass. The design of the equipment installed in paper mills should be based on the specific conditions and regions.
Variable renewable energy-based power is expected to increase toward a sustainable society, although the power cannot be dispatched effectively due to its intermittent nature. To accelerate renewable energy implementation, we simulated energy flows of paper mills installing wind energy and evaluated their potentials to function as energy hubs for appropriate early-stage design. We targeted 39 Japanese paper mills assumed to have thermal energy storage, wind-thermal energy converters and regional woody biomass installed, and analyzed the amount of power and heat selling and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions. The results for the paper mills were compared with conventional mills to examine effective conditions for greenhouse gas reduction. The amount of power or heat selling depended on the capacity of the paper mill and the installed equipment. Most paper mills could reduce greenhouse gas using thermal energy storage, wind energy, and woody biomass. The paper mill with the highest life cycle greenhouse gas reduction, compared with conventional mills, could achieve a 190% reduction. To function as a cogeneration energy hub, the equipment installed in paper mills should be designed according to the conditions of the paper mills and their regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据