4.7 Article

Performance analysis of sorption thermal battery for high-density cold energy storage enabled by novel tube-free evaporator

期刊

ENERGY
卷 273, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127248

关键词

Sorption thermal battery; Massive cold storage; Tube-free evaporator; Numerical model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cold energy storage is important for thermal management and energy utilization. Sorption thermal battery (STB) has advantages over conventional technologies, but suffers from low-power-density energy storage. This study proposes a novel tube-free evaporator to reduce thermal resistance and accelerate sorption rate in STB, leading to improved cold storage performance.
Cold energy storage is of significance to thermal management of electrical devices, air-conditioning, building energy-saving, and renewable energy utilization. Sorption thermal battery (STB) has distinct advantage of high-energy-density cold storage based on liquid-gas vaporization heat when compared with conventional cold storage technologies in the form of sensible heat or solid-liquid latent heat. However, STB suffers from low -power-density energy storage due to its poor heat and mass transfer during reversible solid-gas sorption pro-cesses. Here, a novel tube-free evaporator is proposed and designed for STB to reduce thermal resistance and accelerate sorption rate. The effects of the tube-free evaporator on the heat and mass transfer of STB prototype for cold energy storage are investigated and discussed. The thermal resistance of evaporator can be reduced by 94.9% and the sorption-evaporation rate can be accelerated by 24.2% by using the novel tube-free evaporator. Correspondingly, the STB prototype exhibits superior cold storage performance with improved energy density and peak power density by 32.8% and 50%, respectively. The heat design strategy of tube-free evaporator provides a new solution to develop high-energy/power-density STB for cold storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据