4.4 Article

A Model for the Complete Radial Structure of the Tropical Cyclone Wind Field. Part II: Wind Field Variability

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
卷 73, 期 8, 页码 3093-3113

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0185.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [AGS-1331362]
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Department of Commerce [NA14OAR4320106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Part I of this work developed a simple physical model for the complete radial structure of the low-level azimuthal wind field in a tropical cyclone that compared well with observations. However, wind field variability in the model is tied principally to its external parameters given by the maximum wind speed and the radius of maximum wind, the latter of which lacks a credible independent physical model for its variability. Here the authors explore the modes of variability that arise from the alternative specification of the model, which takes the outer radius in lieu of the radius of maximum wind. Nondimensionalization of the model reveals two theoretical modes of structural variability in absolute angular momentum that are shown to closely match observations. These two modes correspond to three modes of wind field variability associated with variations in intensity, outer storm size, and latitude. These wind field modes are demonstrated to mirror the dominant modes of variability found in nature, in particular the intrastorm variation of inner-core structure and the interstorm variation of overall storm size. In combination, the model offers a credible physical solution for the complete time-dependent tropical cyclone wind field in conjunction with the external specification of intensity, outer size, and latitude. More broadly, the model offers theoretical and conceptual insight into the nature of the tropical cyclone wind field, including the oft-conflated terms size and structure and their distinct variabilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据