4.5 Article

A Modeling Toolkit for Comparing AC and DC Electrical Distribution Efficiency in Buildings

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en16073001

关键词

DC distribution; electrical efficiency; harmonic power flow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, there has been research interest in DC distribution systems for buildings. A modeling toolkit called BEEAM was developed to evaluate AC-only, DC-only, and hybrid AC/DC distribution systems in buildings. The toolkit includes harmonic power flow and nonlinear device descriptions. Simulations using the toolkit showed reasonable accuracy in predicting device and system efficiencies compared to experimental measurements. The toolkit is proposed as a useful tool for comparing efficiency in AC, DC, and hybrid AC/DC distribution systems in buildings.
Recently, there has been considerable research interest in the potential for DC distribution systems in buildings instead of the traditional AC distribution systems. Due to the need for performing power conversions between DC and AC electricity, DC distribution may provide electrical efficiency advantages in some systems. To support comparative evaluations of AC-only, DC-only, and hybrid AC/DC distribution systems in buildings, a new modeling toolkit called the Building Electrical Efficiency Analysis Model (BEEAM) was developed and is described in this paper. To account for harmonics in currents or voltages arising from nonlinear devices, the toolkit implements harmonic power flow, along with nonlinear device behavioral descriptions derived from empirical measurements. This paper describes the framework, network equations, device representations, and an implementation of the toolkit in an open source software package, including a component library and graphical interface for creating circuits. Simulations of electrical behavior and device and system efficiencies using the toolkit are compared with experimental measurements of a small office environment in a variety of operating and load configurations. A detailed analysis of uncertainty estimation is also provided. Key findings were that a comparison of predicted versus measured efficiencies and power losses in the validation testbed using the initial toolkit implementation predicted device- and system-level efficiencies with reasonably good accuracy under both balanced and unbalanced AC scenarios. An uncertainty analysis also revealed that the maximum estimated error for system efficiency across all scenarios was 3%, and measured and modeled system efficiency agreed within the experimental uncertainty in approximately half of the scenarios. Based on the correspondence between simulation and measurement, the toolkit is proposed by the authors as a potentially useful tool for comparing efficiency in AC, DC, and hybrid AC/DC distribution systems in buildings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据