4.5 Article

Balancing the Active Power of a Railway Traction Power Substation with an sp-RPC

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en16073074

关键词

electric railway system; neutral section; multilevel converter; regenerative braking; sectioning post-Rail Power Conditioner

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current railway system has some weaknesses due to increasing demand, which requires an increase in power supply for longer trains and faster locomotives. This paper proposes a control algorithm to minimize the power imbalance in each traction power substation. Excess energy from regenerative braking can be used to assist the traction of another locomotive, increasing the overhead line capacity. Computer models using a modular multilevel converter topology were used to analyze different consumption events and their responses.
The railway system is one of the safest, most efficient, and environmentally friendly means of land transport for people and goods. However, as the demand for mobility has increased, the current railway system has shown some weaknesses, requiring an increase in catenary power in order to be able to supply power to longer trains and faster locomotives, as well as to increase rail traffic. This paper proposes a control algorithm to be implemented in a sectioning post-Rail Power Conditioner (sp-RPC). The sp-RPC is connected to the neutral section between two traction power substations (TPS). With the control algorithm, it is possible to minimize the existing unbalance of the active powers of each TPS. In a regenerative braking condition, this surplus energy can be used to assist the traction of another locomotive on the existing overhead line. In this way, it is possible to increase the capacity of the overhead line. The analysis was performed with computer models using a modular multilevel converter (MMC) topology for the sp-RPC. Quantitative results for different consumption events of the locomotives and the analysis of the response to these variations are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据