4.5 Article

Towards Waste-to-Energy-and-Materials Processes with Advanced Thermochemical Combustion Intelligence in the Circular Economy

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en16041644

关键词

waste-to-energy; inorganic compounds; combustion control; numerical models; data-driven models; municipal solid waste; raw materials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Waste-to-energy processes are essential for the safe removal of materials unsuitable for reuse or recycling in a circular economy. This paper discusses the behavior of inorganic compounds in these processes and highlights the need for improved combustion control systems. It proposes the development of predictive numerical models to better understand and control the behavior of inorganic compounds in waste furnaces.
Waste-to-energy processes remain essential to ensure the safe and irreversible removal of materials and substances that are (or have become) unsuitable for reuse or recycling, and hence, to keep intended cycles of materials in the circular economy clean. In this paper, the behavior of inorganic compounds in waste-to-energy combustion processes are discussed from a multi-disciplinary perspective, against a background of ever tightening emission limits and targets of increasing energy efficiency and materials recovery. This leads to the observation that, due to the typical complexity of thermally treated waste, the intelligence of combustion control systems used in state-of-the-art waste-to-energy plants needs to be expanded to better control the behavior of inorganic compounds that typically end up in waste furnaces. This paper further explains how this goal can be achieved by developing (experimentally validated) predictive numerical models that are engineering-based and/or data-driven. Additionally, the significant economic potential of advanced thermochemical intelligence towards inorganic compounds in waste-to-energy combustion control systems is estimated on the basis of typical operational figures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据