4.5 Article

Automated Quantification of Wind Turbine Blade Leading Edge Erosion from Field Images

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en16062820

关键词

leading edge erosion; wind turbines; wind energy; image processing; image segmentation; convolutional neural network; machine learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wind turbine blade leading edge erosion is a significant issue affecting power production. Two machine learning models were developed to automatically quantify the extent, morphology, and nature of damage from field images. Both models successfully identified approximately 65% of total damage area in independent images.
Wind turbine blade leading edge erosion is a major source of power production loss and early detection benefits optimization of repair strategies. Two machine learning (ML) models are developed and evaluated for automated quantification of the areal extent, morphology and nature (deep, shallow) of damage from field images. The supervised ML model employs convolutional neural networks (CNN) and learns features (specific types of damage) present in an annotated set of training images. The unsupervised approach aggregates pixel intensity thresholding with calculation of pixel-by-pixel shadow ratio (PTS) to independently identify features within images. The models are developed and tested using a dataset of 140 field images. The images sample across a range of blade orientation, aspect ratio, lighting and resolution. Each model (CNN v PTS) is applied to quantify the percent area of the visible blade that is damaged and classifies the damage into deep or shallow using only the images as input. Both models successfully identify approximately 65% of total damage area in the independent images, and both perform better at quantifying deep damage. The CNN is more successful at identifying shallow damage and exhibits better performance when applied to the images after they are preprocessed to a common blade orientation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据