期刊
ENERGIES
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 -出版社
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en16041871
关键词
empirical mode decomposition; ESPRIT; FACTS devices; fault localization; intrinsic time decomposition; S-transform
Modern power systems are complex and susceptible to faults. Accurate fault location is crucial for system restoration and reliability. Fault location methods are used for quick identification, but their accuracy is affected by FACTS devices. This study compares four signal decomposition techniques for fault location in FACTS-compensated systems, and finds that EMD and ESPRIT-based methods are more accurate.
Modern power systems are structurally complex and are vulnerable to undesirable events like faults. In the event of faults in transmission line, accurate fault location improves restoration process, thereby enhancing the reliability of the overall system. Fault location methods (FLMs) are tools which assist in identifying fault locations quickly. However, the accuracy of these FLMs gets affected in the presence of flexible alternating current transmission system (FACTS) devices. Therefore, in this work, the performance of four different signal decomposition techniques aided traveling wave aided FLMs are qualitatively compared in the context of fault localization in FACTS-compensated systems. FLMs based on intrinsic time decomposition (ITD), empirical mode decomposition (EMD), S-transform (ST), and estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance technique (ESPRIT) are investigated. The accuracy of FLMs is tested for different cases of series, shunt, and series-shunt FACTS-compensated systems. A 500 kV system employed with 100 MVAr FACTS device is used for simulation. The instant of arrival wave at end of transmission line is from all aforementioned FLMs. The obtained ATWs are used in fault localization. Further, the associated percentage errors are calculated. The results suggest that EMD and ESPRIT-based FLMs are more accurate than others.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据