Technoeconomic Feasibility of Bioenergy Production from Wood Sawdust

In this study, the technoeconomic feasibility of bioenergy production from sawdust under four different case scenarios is simulated and compared. These scenarios include: (1) heat and electricity generation from raw sawdust; (2) pellet production from sawdust; (3) and (4) integrated biorefinery approach for the simultaneous manufacturing of multiple products (steam-exploded and torrefied pellets) and co-products (furfural, hydroxy methyl furfural (HMF), acetic acid), along with heat and electricity generation. Economic assessments such as cost analysis, payback time (PBT), net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) were determined for these scenarios. The results showed that the approach of producing torrefied pellets, furfural, and acetic acid, along with co-generated heat and electricity, in terms of multiproducts and profitability (NPV (at 7%): USD 38.29 M) was preferable over other alternatives. In terms of simplified technology and other economic indices (PBT: 2.49 year, IRR: 51.33%, and return on investment (ROI): 40.1%), the scenario for producing pellets from wood sawdust was more promising than others. If plant capacity was not a limiting factor, the optimal size for the combined heat and power (CHP) plant was between 250-300 kt for the main product. Additionally, untreated and treated pellet plants equipped with CHP had an optimal size of 150-200 kt of wood pellets per year.

Automated summary

This study simulates and compares the technoeconomic feasibility of bioenergy production from sawdust under four different scenarios. The results show that the approach of producing torrefied pellets, furfural, and acetic acid, along with co-generated heat and electricity, is more advantageous in terms of multiproducts and profitability compared to other alternatives.