4.8 Article

Phosphatidic acid-regulated SOS2 controls sodium and potassium homeostasis in Arabidopsis under salt stress

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 42, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2022112401

关键词

AKT; phosphatidic acid; salt stress; sodium and potassium homeostasis; SOS pathway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The maintenance of Na+/K+ homeostasis is crucial for salt tolerance in plant cells. In this study, it is shown that phosphatidic acid (PA) binds to SOS2, a core member of the SOS pathway, under salt stress, enhancing its activity and plasma membrane localization. PA also promotes the phosphorylation of SCaBP8 by SOS2, which attenuates the inhibition of AKT1, an inward-rectifying K+ channel. These results suggest that PA regulates the SOS pathway and AKT1 activity under salt stress, promoting Na+ efflux and K+ influx to maintain Na+/K+ homeostasis.
The maintenance of sodium/potassium (Na+/K+) homeostasis in plant cells is essential for salt tolerance. Plants export excess Na+ out of cells mainly through the Salt Overly Sensitive (SOS) pathway, activated by a calcium signal; however, it is unknown whether other signals regulate the SOS pathway and how K+ uptake is regulated under salt stress. Phosphatidic acid (PA) is emerging as a lipid signaling molecule that modulates cellular processes in development and the response to stimuli. Here, we show that PA binds to the residue Lys57 in SOS2, a core member of the SOS pathway, under salt stress, promoting the activity and plasma membrane localization of SOS2, which activates the Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 to promote the Na+ efflux. In addition, we reveal that PA promotes the phosphorylation of SOS3-like calcium-binding protein 8 (SCaBP8) by SOS2 under salt stress, which attenuates the SCaBP8-mediated inhibition of Arabidopsis K+ transporter 1 (AKT1), an inward-rectifying K+ channel. These findings suggest that PA regulates the SOS pathway and AKT1 activity under salt stress, promoting Na+ efflux and K+ influx to maintain Na+/K+ homeostasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据