4.6 Article

Reduced hysteresis and enhanced air stability of low-temperature processed carbon-based perovskite solar cells by surface modification

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 443, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.141935

关键词

Carbon-based perovskite solar cells (C-PSCs); SnO2; Hexyl trimethylammonium bromide (HTAB); Surface passivation; Carbon electrode

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low temperature processed carbon-based perovskite solar cells (C-PSCs) have been developed as low-cost and easily fabricated alternatives to traditional perovskite solar cells. However, their power conversion efficiency (PCE) still lags behind that of traditional perovskite solar cells with gold contacts.
Low temperature processed carbon-based perovskite solar cells (C-PSCs) have gained great interest because of low cost and ease of fabrication. By replacing the Au electrode with carbon, stable solar cells suited for mass-production process can be made. However, power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of C-PSCs still lag behind that of PSCs with Au contact.Here we explore low temperature (<= 150 degrees C) processed C-PSCs with, where a two-step method is used to prepare mixed-ion lead perovskite films, with tin oxide (SnO2) electron transport layer, poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT) hole transport layer and carbon electrode, resulting in devices with a PCE of 14.0%. Moreover, hexyl trimethylammonium bromide (HTAB) was introduced to improve the interface between perovskite and P3HT. Perovskite grains were remarkably enlarged into micrometer-size and defects were reduced. As a result, a champion PCE of 16.1% was obtained, mainly due to enhanced fill factor from 0.67 to 0.73. The interface modification by HTAB molecule is an effective way to passivate the perovskite defects and facilitate the carrier transport at the perovskite/HTL interface. Unencapsulated devices showed excellent stability over 1500 h stored under ambient air (relative humidity -50 +/- 10%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据