4.6 Article

Cycling performance and interface stability research of tubular protonic reversible solid oxide cells with air electrodes by different manufacturing processes

期刊

ELECTROCHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2023.107507

关键词

Proton conductor; Tubular reversible solid oxide cells; Thermal Cycle; Stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of microstructural change of air electrodes on the performance and cycling stability of protonic reversible solid oxide cells (P-rSOCs) are investigated using tubular cells with large active area (7.5 cm2). A BCZI@LSC composite air electrode is prepared through a wet chemical procedure and shows an increased current density of 51% compared to the BCZI + LSC composite air electrode prepared by conventional mechanical mixing.
The electrode microstructure and interface stability play an important role during thermal cycles and reversible cycles for protonic reversible solid oxide cells (P-rSOCs). In this work, the effects of microstructural change of air electrodes on the performance and cycling stability are investigated by using tubular cells with large active area (7.5 cm2). The BaCe0.5Zr0.4In0.1O3@ La0.6Sr0.4CoO3 (BCZI@LSC) composite air electrode is prepared through a wet chemical procedure based on infiltration of the LSC precursor solution into the BCZI electrolyte skeleton. The LSC nanoparticles attach to the electrolyte skeleton in a continuous film-forming morphology, affording abun-dant three-phase reaction boundaries (TPBs) and the continuous conducting phase. Compared to the BCZI + LSC composite air electrode prepared by conventional mechanical mixing, the cell with the BCZI@LSC electrode demonstrates an increased current density of 51%. The cell with the BCZI + LSC electrode shows acceptable stability during 14 reversible FC-EC cycles and 4 thermal cycles (between 650 degrees C and room temperature) for 360 h in 20% H2O-air atmosphere. The differences in stability for cells prepared by the two processes are compared and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据