4.6 Article

Survival outcomes following salvage abdominoperineal resection for recurrent and persistent anal squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

EJSO
卷 49, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.05.004

关键词

Anal canal cancer; Squamous cell carcinoma; Salvage abdominoperineal resection; Locoregional failure; Recurrent disease; Persistent disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the survival outcomes of salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) for recurrent and persistent diseases in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) patients who experienced locoregional failure after chemoradiotherapy. The results showed that salvage APR had significantly higher overall survival for recurrent disease compared to non-salvage APR, but there was no significant difference for persistent disease. The study highlights the importance of distinguishing between recurrent and persistent diseases in determining the appropriate treatment strategy.
Introduction: The primary treatment for locoregional failure following chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR). However, it is necessary to distinguish between recurrent and persistent diseases because of their varied pathologies. We aimed to clarify the survival outcomes following salvage APR for recurrent and persistent diseases and investigate the significance of salvage APR. Materials and methods: This multicentre retrospective cohort study used clinical data from 47 hospitals. All patients were diagnosed with SCCA and underwent definitive radiotherapy as the primary treatment between 1991 and 2015. Overall survival (OS) was compared between the following cohorts: salvage APR for recurrence, salvage APR for persistence, non-salvage APR for recurrence, and non-salvage APR for persistence.Results: Five-year OS of salvage APR for recurrence, salvage APR for persistence, non-salvage APR for recurrence, and non-salvage APR for persistence were 75% (46%-90%), 36% (21%-51%), 42% (21%-61%), and 47% (33%-60%), respectively. OS of salvage APR for the recurrent disease was significantly higher than that for persistent disease (p = 0.00597). For recurrent disease, OS following salvage APR was significantly higher than that following non-salvage APR (p = 0.0204); however, for persistent disease, there was no significant difference between salvage and non-salvage APR (p = 0.928).Conclusion: Survival outcomes following salvage APR for persistent disease were significantly worse than that for recurrent disease. Salvage APR did not improve survival outcomes for persistent disease compared to non-salvage APR. These results will elicit a review of persistent disease treatment strategies.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd, BASO -The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据