4.8 Article

The role of fire in terrestrial vertebrate richness patterns

期刊

ECOLOGY LETTERS
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 563-574

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.14177

关键词

biogeography; fire; global biodiversity; latitudinal species richness; net primary productivity

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Productivity and terrestrial species richness patterns are strongly correlated, but the role of fire in global diversity has been understudied. This study examines the sensitivity of terrestrial vertebrate biodiversity to fire, while considering other drivers. The findings reveal that fire has a significant positive association with bird and mammal diversity, rivaling the effects of productivity, while there are few clear associations for amphibians. These results highlight the underappreciated role of fire in shaping animal species richness and conserving global biodiversity.
Productivity is strongly associated with terrestrial species richness patterns, although the mechanisms underpinning such patterns have long been debated. Despite considerable consumption of primary productivity by fire, its influence on global diversity has received relatively little study. Here we examine the sensitivity of terrestrial vertebrate biodiversity (amphibians, birds and mammals) to fire, while accounting for other drivers. We analyse global data on terrestrial vertebrate richness, net primary productivity, fire occurrence (fraction of productivity consumed) and additional influences unrelated to productivity (i.e., historical phylogenetic and area effects) on species richness. For birds, fire is associated with higher diversity, rivalling the effects of productivity on richness, and for mammals, fire's positive association with diversity is even stronger than productivity; for amphibians, in contrast, there are few clear associations. Our findings suggest an underappreciated role for fire in the generation of animal species richness and the conservation of global biodiversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据