4.7 Article

Eco-evolutionary contributions to community trait change in floating aquatic plants

期刊

ECOLOGY
卷 104, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.4117

关键词

adaptation; community trait dynamics; duckweed; eco-evolutionary dynamics; eco-evolutionary partition; Lemnaceae; phenotypic plasticity; reciprocal transplant; Ricciocarpos; species sorting; trait change

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When the environment changes, the entire community of organisms may undergo modifications through physiological processes, evolutionary processes, or shifts in species composition. However, how these sources of change combine to drive community trait dynamics is not well understood.
An entire community of organisms may become modified when its environment changes. These modifications can happen through physiological processes (plasticity), evolutionary processes (adaptation) or shifts in species composition (sorting). The outcome of these three sources of change constitutes the community's phenotypic response, but how they combine to drive community trait dynamics is not currently well understood. We have conducted a community selection experiment in which communities of short-lived floating aquatic plants were grown in a range of stressful conditions, and measured changes in their body size. Determinants of phenotypic change were assessed with a full community reciprocal transplant which led to estimates of the contributions of plasticity, adaptation, and sorting. Species were modified during the experiment by both plasticity and adaptation, but in either case the magnitude and direction of change differed among species. Sorting and adaptation were of equal magnitude but tended to act in opposite directions: in conditions where species with large fronds prevailed, each species evolved smaller fronds, and vice versa. We conclude that community trait dynamics cannot be understood simply by extrapolating the adaptive response of any single species to the whole community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据