4.7 Article

How payments for ecosystem services can undermine Indigenous institutions: The case of Peru?s Ampiyacu-Apayacu watershed

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
卷 205, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107723

关键词

Payments for ecosystem services; Degrowth; Buen vivir; Political ecology; Indigenous rights; Tropical forest conservation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Payments for ecosystem services have become the main international policies for addressing tropical deforestation. Critics argue that these approaches, by focusing on economic growth, can disrupt local conservation systems and harm forestdwelling communities. Indigenous groups have proposed alternative strategies, such as buen vivir, to promote good living and protect forests. The National Forest Conservation Program (NFCP) in Peru pays Indigenous communities for reducing deforestation, but its implementation may erode local conservation systems and push communities towards commodity production and employer-employee relationships.
Payments for ecosystem services have come to dominate international policies for addressing tropical deforestation. Political ecologists, degrowth scholars, and Indigenous activists have critiqued these approaches on the grounds that by centering economic growth, they can disrupt local conservation systems and compromise forestdwelling communities' ability to protect forests and live well. Meanwhile, Indigenous groups have developed positive alternatives to 'green growth' strategies, including buen vivir (good living) in Latin America. In Peru, the National Forest Conservation Program (NFCP) serves as the state's flagship initiative to address tropical deforestation in Indigenous communities by paying communities for demonstrated reductions in deforestation, so long as they invest those funds according to an agreed up on management plan. We analyzed how the NFCP has interacted with quality-of-life plans, Indigenous planning tools rooted in buen vivir. Our findings suggest that the NFCP has eroded local systems for conservation, including the minga, an Amazonian tradition of mutual aid and shared labor for subsistence livelihoods, pushing communities to replace these systems with commodity production and employer-employee relationships. We argue that instead of imposing onerous conditions and steering communities towards evermore commodity production, conservation initiatives should support the implementation of quality-of-life plans. We suggest that climate justice organizers, political ecologists, and degrowth scholars explore and advocate for such initiatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据