4.3 Article

Examination of foot sensations in children with generalized joint hypermobility

期刊

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2023.105755

关键词

Generalized joint hypermobility; Child; Tactile sensation; Proprioception

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate foot and ankle sensory abilities in children with generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) and compare them with healthy controls. The results showed that children with GJH had deficiencies in foot sole tactile sense and ankle joint position sense. Therefore, neurosensorimotor examination of balance and coordination should be conducted and appropriate intervention programs should be planned for children with GJH.
Background: Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) is a condition that can be observed in children and children with GJH may have problems such as clumsiness, proprioceptive sensory loss, balance and coordination disorders.Aims: To evaluate foot and ankle senses in children with GJH and compare them with their healthy peers.Study design: A cross-sectional study.Subjects: Children aged 5-14 years with and without GJH were included in the study. Outcome measures: After assessing the joint hypermobility of the children with the Beighton Score, tactile, vi-bration, two-point discrimination, and proprioception senses were evaluated.Results: A total of 40 children (15 females, 25 males, mean age 9.43 years, SD +/- 2.98 years, 20 with GJH and 20 without GJH) were included in the study. In children with GJH, foot sole tactile sense and ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion joint position sense were deficient in comparison with healthy controls (p < 0.05).Conclusions: There were deficiencies in foot and ankle tactile and proprioceptive senses in children with GJH. Neurosensorimotor examination of balance and coordination should be performed and appropriate intervention programs should be planned accordingly in children with GJH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据