4.3 Article

Helicase activities of Rad5 and Rrm3 genetically interact in the prevention of recombinogenic DNA lesions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

期刊

DNA REPAIR
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103488

关键词

Rrm3; Rad5; Mus81; Helicase; Replication fork restart; Chromosomal rearrangements; Recombinogenic DNA lesions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To ensure genome stability, replication progress needs to be monitored and accurately completed. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the DNA helicase Rrm3, belonging to the PIF1 family, facilitates replication fork progression through an unknown mechanism. Disrupting Rrm3 helicase activity leads to increased replication fork pausing in the yeast genome.
The genome must be monitored to ensure its duplication is completed accurately to prevent genome instability. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the 5 ' to 3 ' DNA helicase Rrm3, a member of the conserved PIF1 family, facilitates replication fork progression through an unknown mechanism. Disruption of Rrm3 helicase activity leads to increased replication fork pausing throughout the yeast genome. Here, we show that Rrm3 contributes to replication stress tolerance in the absence of the fork reversal activity of Rad5, defined by its HIRAN domain and DNA helicase activity, but not in the absence of Rad5 ' s ubiquitin ligase activity. The Rrm3 and Rad5 helicase activities also interact in the prevention of recombinogenic DNA lesions, and DNA lesions that accumulate in their absence need to be salvaged by a Rad59-dependent recombination pathway. Disruption of the structurespecific endonuclease Mus81 leads to accumulation of recombinogenic DNA lesions and chromosomal rearrangements in the absence of Rrm3, but not Rad5. Thus, at least two mechanisms exist to overcome fork stalling at replication barriers, defined by Rad5-mediated fork reversal and Mus81-mediated cleavage, and contribute to the maintenance of chromosome stability in the absence of Rrm3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据