4.4 Article

Improving balance in community-dwelling elders using trained volunteers within faith-based institutions: a mixed methods feasibility study

期刊

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2185293

关键词

Community falls; Older people; Faith institutions; Volunteer-led; Balance improvement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a volunteer-led balance programme for older adults. A feasibility cluster RCT with focus groups was conducted in faith-based institutions. The results showed that the programme was feasible and acceptable in one geographical area but requires evaluation in diverse communities.
PurposeTo investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a volunteer-led balance programme for older adults.MethodsA feasibility cluster RCT with focus groups were conducted in faith-based institutions. Eligibility criteria were: participants were >= 65 years, able to do five times sit -to-stand, had no falls in the previous six months and had good mental capacity. The intervention included supervised group exercises and exercise booklets for six months, education and a fall poster. Assessments included, TUG, MCTSiB, FTST, FES, mABC, OPQoL and DGLS at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 months. Feasibility measures included numbers of volunteers, sessions, and volunteers time commitment, views of participants about sustainability of program using qualitative focus groups and volunteers' ability to deliver programme.ResultsThree churches participated with 31 participants in each group. Participants had a mean age of 77.3 years, were 100% British, and 79% female. The sample size estimate for a future trial using TUG, was 79 per group. Focus groups showed perceived social and physical improvements in participants, need to extend the programme to the wider community, and increased confidence, participation and socialisation.ConclusionThe community-based balance training in faith-based institutions, was feasible and acceptable in one geographical area and requires evaluation in cohesive diverse communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据