4.4 Article

The effects of mechanical hippotherapy riding on postural control, balance, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with stroke

期刊

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2221458

关键词

NCT03528993; Stroke; balance; postural control; hippotherapy simulation; rehabilitation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the effects of exercises by mechanical hippotherapy devices on postural control, balance, mobility, and Quality of Life in patients with stroke. The results showed that exercises using mechanical hippotherapy devices can significantly improve postural control, functional mobility, and balance in patients with stroke, and may also improve the quality of life.
PurposeDThis study aimed to investigate the effects of exercises by mechanical hippotherapy devices on postural control, balance, mobility, and Quality of Life in patients with stroke.Material and methodsThis was a randomized controlled clinical trial with a total of 30 which were randomly divided into two groups. The participants in the mechanical hippotherapy group (MHG) (n = 15) were given exercises with a mechanical hippotherapy device for 15 min in addition to intensive conventional treatments (45 min), while the control group (CG) (n = 15) received additional 15 min of postural control and balance exercises for five days per week for four consecutive weeks. The primary outcome was The Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Secondary outcomes were the Fugl-Meyer (FM) Rating Scale, Biodex Balance Measurement (BBM), Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and quality of Life Short Form (SF-36).ResultsIn the MHG, FM-Lower extremity score (-6.4, p = 0.024), FM-Upper extremity score (-12.87, p = 0.013), TIS (-5.87, p = 0.04) and TUG (5.73, p = 0.027) improved statistically significant compared to CG.ConclusionExercises using mechanical hippotherapy devices could improve postural control, functional mobility and balance in patients with stroke. It may also improve the quality of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据