4.4 Review

Cholestatic Pruritus Treatments in Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Systematic Literature Review

期刊

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
卷 68, 期 6, 页码 2710-2730

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-07862-z

关键词

Cholestatic pruritus; Primary biliary cholangitis; Primary sclerosing cholangitis; Treatment decisions; Quality of life; Evidence-based medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a systematic literature review to investigate the evidence supporting treatment decisions for cholestatic pruritus associated with PBC and PSC. The findings showed a lack of consistent and reproducible evidence on the efficacy, impact on HRQoL, and safety of cholestatic pruritus treatments, leading physicians to rely on clinical experience for treatment selection.
Background and AimsWe conducted a systematic literature review to understand the evidence supporting treatment decisions for cholestatic pruritus associated with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).MethodsStudies that enrolled >= 75% participants with PBC or PSC and reported >= 1 endpoint(s) related to efficacy, safety, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or other patient-reported outcomes were included. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the Quality of Cohort studies tool for non-RCTs.ResultsThirty-nine publications were identified, covering 42 studies and six treatment classes (including investigational and approved products): anion-exchange resins, antibiotics (rifampicin/derivatives), opiates, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fibrates, ileal bile acid transporter inhibitors and other agents not categorised in these six classes. Across studies, median sample size was small (n = 18), 20 studies were over 20 years old, 25 followed patients for <= 6 weeks, only 25 were RCTs. Pruritus was assessed using several different tools, with inconsistencies in their application. Cholestyramine, considered first-line therapy for moderate-severe cholestatic pruritus, was assessed in six studies (two RCTs) including 56 patients with PBC and 2 with PSC, with evidence of efficacy demonstrated in only three studies, among which, two RCTs were assessed as having a high risk of bias. Findings were similar for other drug classes.ConclusionsThere is a lack of consistent and reproducible evidence available on efficacy, impact on HRQoL, and safety of cholestatic pruritus treatments, leaving physicians to rely on clinical experience rather than evidence-based medicine for treatment selection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据