4.6 Article

Design and simulation of compact graphene-based plasmonic flip-flop using a resonant ring

期刊

DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2023.109904

关键词

Graphene; Optical flip-flop; Resonant ring; Surface plasmon polariton

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An all-optical plasmonic D flip-flop based on graphene is proposed in this study. By sandwiching a graphene layer between two SnO2 layers, the confinement and transmission of surface plasmon polaritons is achieved. The designed resonant ring allows for constructive interferences at a wavelength of 12.9 μm. The compact subwavelength flip-flop with an area of 0.27 μm2 shows low cross-talk of -7.78 dB and offers promising potential for use in optical circuits.
In this study, an all-optical plasmonic D flip-flop based on graphene is proposed. A graphene layer is sandwiched between two SnO2 layers for confinement and transmission of surface plasmon polaritons. A resonant ring is designed for approaching the constructive interferences for a wavelength of 12.9 mu m. Two output ports Q and Q ' receive the applied signal from inputs D and Clk. By adjusting the graphene chemical potential of 0.1 eV and 1 eV, the transmittance of the waveguides can be controlled. Concerning the structure's dimensions, a low loss of 0.34 dB/mu m for waveguides with a width of 50 nm allows the surface plasmon polaritons to transmit through the designed waveguides in response to a chemical potential of 1 eV. The area of the designed subwavelength flipflop is as small as 0.27 mu m2, more compact than the previous works. The cross-talk of -7.78 dB is another advantage of the presented structure that helps to close the waveguides. Compactness and low cross-talk are the essential parameters in designing optical circuits. Also, the contrast ratio of Q and Q ' is equal to 13.83 dB and 3.63 dB, respectively. The obtained results promise the designed flip-flop for use in optical circuits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据