4.7 Article

Childhood adiposity and novel subtypes of adult-onset diabetes: a Mendelian randomisation and genome-wide genetic correlation study

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 66, 期 6, 页码 1052-1056

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-023-05883-x

关键词

Epidemiology; Obesity; Prediction; Prevention; Type 2 diabetes; Weight regulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using Mendelian randomisation, this study investigated whether the effects of childhood adiposity on adult-onset diabetes vary across different diabetes subtypes. The results showed that childhood adiposity had significant genetically predicted effects on severe autoimmune diabetes, severe insulin-deficient diabetes, severe insulin-resistant diabetes, and mild obesity-related diabetes, but not on mild age-related diabetes. These findings highlight the importance of preventing childhood obesity.
Aims/hypothesis: We investigated whether the impacts of childhood adiposity on adult-onset diabetes differ across proposed diabetes subtypes using a Mendelian randomisation (MR) design.Methods We performed MR analysis using data from European genome-wide association studies of childhood adiposity, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA, proxy for severe autoimmune diabetes), severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD), severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD), mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD) and mild age-related diabetes (MARD).Results Higher levels of childhood adiposity had positive genetically predicted effects on LADA (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.05, 2.52), SIDD (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.18, 3.80), SIRD (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.60, 4.75) and MOD (OR 7.30, 95% CI 4.17, 12.78), but not MARD (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.70, 1.60).Conclusions/interpretation Childhood adiposity is a risk factor not only for adult-onset diabetes primarily characterised by obesity or insulin resistance, but also for subtypes primarily characterised by insulin deficiency or autoimmunity. These findings emphasise the importance of preventing childhood obesity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据