4.4 Article

Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Based Composite Metrics: A Review and Assessment of Performance in Recent-Onset and Long-Duration Type 1 Diabetes

期刊

DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 497-506

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2022.0563

关键词

Composite metric; Continuous glucose monitoring; Glucose time in range; Glycated hemoglobin; Hypoglycemia; Type 1 diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the correlations between CGM-based composite metrics and standard glucose metrics in individuals with recent-onset and long-duration type 1 diabetes. Fourteen composite metrics focusing on overall glycemia, glycemic variability, and hypoglycemia were identified. The overall glycemia-focused metrics strongly correlated with glucose time in range, while the hypoglycemia-focused metrics were sensitive to automated insulin delivery therapy.
This study examined correlations between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based composite metrics and standard glucose metrics within CGM data sets from individuals with recent-onset and long-duration type 1 diabetes. First, a literature review and critique of published CGM-based composite metrics was undertaken. Second, composite metric results were calculated for the two CGM data sets and correlations with six standard glucose metrics were examined. Fourteen composite metrics met selection criteria; these metrics focused on overall glycemia (n = 8), glycemic variability (n = 4), and hypoglycemia (n = 2), respectively. Results for the two diabetes cohorts were similar. All eight metrics focusing on overall glycemia strongly correlated with glucose time in range; none strongly correlated with time below range. The eight overall glycemia-focused and two hypoglycemia-focused composite metrics were all sensitive to automated insulin delivery therapeutic intervention. Until a composite metric can adequately capture both achieved target glycemia and hypoglycemia burden, the current two-dimensional CGM assessment approach may offer greatest clinical utility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据