4.7 Article

Exercise in Patients on Dialysis: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 1259-1268

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2016030378

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have suggested the benefits of physical exercise for patients on dialysis. We conducted the Exercise Introduction to Enhance Performance in Dialysis trial, a 6-month randomized, multicenter trial to test whether a simple, personalized walking exercise program at home, managed by dialysis staff, improves functional status in adult patients on dialysis. The main study outcomes included change in physical performance at 6 months, assessed by the 6-minute walking test and the five times sit-to-stand test, and in quality of life, assessed by the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form (KDQOL-SF) questionnaire. We randomized 296 patients to normal physical activity (control; n=145) or walking exercise (n=151); 227 patients (exercise n=104; control n=123) repeated the 6-month evaluations. The distance covered during the 6-minute walking test improved in the exercise group (mean distance +/- SD: baseline, 328 +/- 96 m; 6 months, 367 +/- 113 m) but not in the control group (baseline, 321 +/- 107 m; 6 months, 324 +/- 116 m; P<0.001 between groups). Similarly, the five times sit-to-stand test time improved in the exercise group (mean time SD: baseline, 20.5 +/- 6.0 seconds; 6 months, 18.2 +/- 5.7 seconds) but not in the control group (baseline, 20.9 +/- 5.8 seconds; 6 months, 20.2 +/- 6.4 seconds; P=0.001 between groups). The cognitive function score (P=0.04) and quality of social interaction score (P=0.01) in the kidney disease component of the KDQOL-SF improved significantly in the exercise arm compared with the control arm. Hence, a simple, personalized, home-based, low-intensity exercise program managed by dialysis staff may improve physical performance and quality of life in patients on dialysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据