4.7 Article

Impact of Polymorphism in the beta(2)-Receptor Gene on the Metabolic Response to Epinephrine After Repeated Hypoglycemia

期刊

DIABETES
卷 72, 期 6, 页码 728-734

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db22-0718

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impact of the ADRB2 gene polymorphism Gly16Arg on the metabolic response to epinephrine before and after repetitive hypoglycemia. The results showed that the insulin, glycerol, and free fatty acid responses to epinephrine were decreased in participants with the Arg16 genotype compared with those with the Gly16 genotype before hypoglycemia, but there was no difference in glucose response. However, there were no differences in response to epinephrine between genotype groups after repetitive hypoglycemia.
The beta(2)-receptor mediates the metabolic response to epinephrine. This study investigates the impact of the beta(2)-receptor gene (ADRB2) polymorphism Gly16Arg on the metabolic response to epinephrine before and after repetitive hypoglycemia. Twenty-five healthy men selected according to ADRB2 genotype being homozygous for either Gly16 (GG) (n = 12) or Arg16 (AA) (n = 13) participated in 4 trial days (D1-4): D1(pre) and D4(post) with epinephrine 0.06 mu g kg(-1).min(-1) infusion and D2(hypo1-2) and D3(hypo3) with three periods of hypoglycemia by an insulin-glucose clamp. At D1pre, the insulin (mean +/- SEM of area under the curve 44 +/- 8 vs. 93 +/- 13 pmol . L-1 h; P = 0.0051), glycerol (79 +/- 12 vs. 115 +/- 14 mu mol . L-1 h; P = 0.041), and free fatty acid (724 +/- 96 vs. 1,113 +/- 140 mu mol . L-1 h; P = 0.033) responses to epinephrine were decreased in AA participants compared with GG participants but without a difference in glucose response. There were no differences in response to epinephrine between genotype groups after repetitive hypoglycemia at D4post. The metabolic substrate response to epinephrine was decreased in AA participants compared with GG participants but without a difference between genotype groups after repetitive hypoglycemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据