4.7 Article

Computational fluid dynamics simulation of forward osmosis (FO) membrane systems: Methodology, state of art, challenges and opportunities

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 549, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2022.116359

关键词

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Forward osmosis; Concentration polarisation; Methodology; Verification and validation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forward osmosis (FO) has gained significant research attention for its potential application in seawater desalination. The advancements in FO experimental studies have been accompanied by an increase in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies over the past decade. Advanced CFD techniques have allowed for the study of complex flow patterns and the suggestion of solutions to existing problems in FO design and operations. The review of CFD methodology, assumptions, and mathematical models used for FO processes, as well as the discussion on verification and validation, provides insights into the current state of art and challenges in FO CFD studies.
Forward osmosis (FO) has attracted wide research attention owing to its potential application in seawater desalination. In the past decade, the research advancements in FO experimental studies have been accompanied by an increase in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies. With advanced CFD techniques, the complex flow patterns related to FO design and different operating conditions are now being studied and some solutions to existing problems are being suggested. Therefore, it is timely to review the CFD methodology, the detailed as-sumptions made and the mathematical models used for the FO processes. In addition, the problem of verification and validation is discussed in detail, together with the present state of art based on work over the last decade. Many FO CFD works have focused on varying membrane properties and operating conditions, while some have attempted to shed insight into the mechanisms that lead to flux enhancement. Finally, challenges and research opportunities related to FO CFD studies are provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据