4.4 Review

Anticoagulation and hemostasis on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 297-302

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000001247

关键词

anticoagulation; bleeding; blood coagulation tests; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; thrombosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this review is to discuss the hemostatic changes induced by ECMO, the balance between bleeding and clotting risks, and the risks associated with anticoagulation and hemostatic transfusions. Recent findings suggest that anti-Xa-guided strategies may decrease bleeding complications without increasing clotting events. However, further research is needed to confirm these results in randomized controlled trials.
Purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is to describe the hemostatic changes induced by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), the need to balance the risks of bleeding and clotting with anticoagulation and hemostatic transfusions, and the inherent risks to these interventions.Recent findingsBoth bleeding and clotting are frequent complications of ECMO. To prevent clotting events, virtually, all children are anticoagulated. However, the optimal anticoagulation strategy is unknown. A recent systematic review of observational studies showed that anti-Xa-guided strategies were associated with a two-fold decrease in bleeding and no increase in clotting complications. These results need to be tested in randomized controlled trials. To avoid bleeding events, platelet transfusions are frequently prescribed to children on ECMO. However, platelet transfusions have recently been shown to be independently associated with increased bleeding and clotting. Therefore, the optimal platelet transfusion strategy must be evaluated appropriately.Most patients on ECMO will develop either a hemorrhagic or thrombotic complication. Balancing these risks involves careful titration of anticoagulation to prevent clotting and hemostatic transfusions to prevent bleeding. As the current level of evidence is low, prospective randomized trials are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据