4.3 Review

Increased Risk of Preeclampsia with Assisted Reproductive Technologies

期刊

CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS
卷 25, 期 9, 页码 251-261

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11906-023-01250-8

关键词

Preeclampsia; Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; Pregnancy complications; Assisted reproductive technology; Frozen embryo transfer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review assesses the association between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and preeclampsia, based on recent available data. Retrospective clinical studies predominantly support the link between ART and preeclampsia. Both clinical and pre-clinical studies suggest that specific ART procedures, such as in vitro embryo handling and development, hormone stimulation, transfer cycle types, and use of donor oocytes/embryos, may contribute to the increased risk. Potential mechanisms include epigenetic aberrations, absence of factors secreted by the corpus luteum, and immunologic responses to allogenic gametes.
Purpose of ReviewWe summarized recent available data to assess the association between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and risk for preeclampsia.Recent FindingsThe majority of clinical studies supporting the association of preeclampsia and ART are retrospective. Published data from both clinical and pre-clinical studies suggest specific ART procedures may contribute to the increased risk, including in vitro embryo handling and development, hormone stimulation, transfer cycle types, and use of donor oocytes/embryos. Potential mechanisms include epigenetic aberrations leading to abnormal placentation, absence of factors secreted by the corpus luteum, and immunologic responses to allogenic gametes.There is an increased risk of preeclampsia following ART. Treatment plans that favor reduced preeclampsia risk should be considered for ART pregnancies. To make ART pregnancies safer, additional clinical and animal model studies are needed to elucidate the underpinnings of this risk association.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据