4.8 Article

Release from sexual selection leads to rapid genome-wide evolution in Aedes aegypti

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 33, 期 7, 页码 1351-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.02.031

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the mating strategy and sexual selection in the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti, and reveals the significant impact of sexual selection on the species' genome.
The yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti, mates in flight as part of ephemeral aggregations termed swarms. Swarms contain many more males than females, and males are thought to be subject to intense sexual selection.1,2 However, which male traits are involved in mating success and the genetic basis of these traits remains unclear. We used an experimental evolution approach to measure genome-wide responses of Ae. aegypti evolved in the presence and absence of sexual selection. These data revealed for the first time how sexual selection shapes the genome of this important species. We found that populations evolved under sexual selection retained greater genetic similarity to the ancestral population and a higher effective popu-lation size than populations evolving without sexual selection. When we compared evolutionary regimes, we found that genes associated with chemosensation responded rapidly to the elimination of sexual selec-tion. Knockdown of one high-confidence candidate gene identified in our analysis significantly decreased male insemination success, further suggesting that genes related to male sensory perception are under sex-ual selection. Several mosquito control technologies involve the release of males from captive populations into the wild. For these interventions to work, a released male must compete against wild males to success-fully inseminate a female. Our results suggest that maintaining the intensity of sexual selection in captive pop-ulations used in mass-releases is important for sustaining both male competitive ability and overall genetic similarity to field populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据