4.8 Review

Impacts of large herbivores on terrestrial ecosystems

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 33, 期 11, 页码 R584-R610

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.04.024

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large herbivores have significant ecological impacts, but research findings are often conflicting and uncertain. They consistently control plant dynamics, species composition, biomass, and suppress fires and smaller animal abundance. However, the effects on predation risk, trophic cascades, seed dispersal, and biogeochemistry are less clear. The role of body size in regulating ecological impact is important, and losing large-herbivore species will alter net impact.
Large herbivores play unique ecological roles and are disproportionately imperiled by human activity. As many wild populations dwindle towards extinction, and as interest grows in restoring lost biodiversity, research on large herbivores and their ecological impacts has intensified. Yet, results are often conflicting or contingent on local conditions, and new findings have challenged conventional wisdom, making it hard to discern general principles. Here, we review what is known about the ecosystem impacts of large her-bivores globally, identify key uncertainties, and suggest priorities to guide research. Many findings are generalizable across ecosystems: large herbivores consistently exert top-down control of plant demog-raphy, species composition, and biomass, thereby suppressing fires and the abundance of smaller ani-mals. Other general patterns do not have clearly defined impacts: large herbivores respond to predation risk but the strength of trophic cascades is variable; large herbivores move vast quantities of seeds and nutrients but with poorly understood effects on vegetation and biogeochemistry. Questions of the great-est relevance for conservation and management are among the least certain, including effects on carbon storage and other ecosystem functions and the ability to predict outcomes of extinctions and reintroduc-tions. A unifying theme is the role of body size in regulating ecological impact. Small herbivores cannot fully substitute for large ones, and large-herbivore species are not functionally redundant - losing any, especially the largest, will alter net impact, helping to explain why livestock are poor surrogates for wild species. We advocate leveraging a broad spectrum of techniques to mechanistically explain how large-herbivore traits and environmental context interactively govern the ecological impacts of these animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据