4.5 Article

Different times, similar mechanism? Convergent patterns in light-induced phenotypic plasticity in Devonian and modern corals

期刊

CORAL REEFS
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 893-903

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00338-023-02394-4

关键词

Devonian; Reef; Tabulate corals; Phenotypic plasticity; Photosymbiosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modern scleractinian corals and extinct Palaeozoic tabulate corals both exhibit high phenotypic plasticity and can alter their morphology in response to light intensity. This study provides evidence that Devonian tabulate corals, such as Roseoporella and Alveolites, showed a similar mechanism to modern scleractinians in changing their morphology depending on light conditions. This suggests that Palaeozoic tabulate corals shared functional characteristics with modern scleractinians.
Modern scleractinian corals can display high phenotypic plasticity, which reflects an interplay among various environmental controls, such as sediment input, water hydrodynamics or light intensity. In particular, the latter can strongly influence the morphology of coral species living across broad depth gradients. Light intensity was also a factor shaping the colonies of extinct Palaeozoic tabulate corals (Anthozoa: Tabulata). Based on gradual transitions in morphology observed in corals from the Middle Devonian (Givetian stage, similar to 385 Ma) mesophotic coral ecosystems (MCE) of the Aferdou el Mrakib reef (Anti-Atlas mountains, Morocco) and comparative material originating from different palaeobathymetric and biogeographical settings, we show that Devonian tabulate corals, such as Roseoporella and Alveolites, were characterised by high phenotypic plasticity and the ability to dramatically change their morphology depending on the inferred light conditions. Such a mechanism is similar to that observed in modern scleractinians, e.g. Porites sillimaniana. This recurring morphological theme suggests that Palaeozoic tabulate corals shared many functional characteristics of modern scleractinians.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据