4.6 Article

Microservice combination optimisation based on improved gray wolf algorithm

期刊

CONNECTION SCIENCE
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09540091.2023.2175791

关键词

Quality of service; grey wolf optimizer; microservice combination optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a microservice combination approach based on the QoS model and a CGWO algorithm for the optimization computation. Experimental results show that the error rate of the method is only 0.528% on the non-functional combination optimization problem, and the computational efficiency of the algorithm increases by 97.29%. CGWO improves the accuracy of optimization by 65.97% and 81.25% respectively compared to the prototype algorithm (GWO), and has a stable optimization performance.
Microservices architecture is a new paradigm for application development. The problem of optimising the performance of microservice architectures from a non-functional perspective is a typical Nondeterministic Polynomial (NP) problem. Therefore, aiming to quantify the non-functional requirements of computing microservice systems, while solving the problem of latency in computing the best combination of services with the maximum QoS objective function value, this paper proposes a microservice combination approach based on the QoS model and a CGWO algorithm for optimisation computation for this model. The experimental results verify that the error rate of the method is only 0.528% on the non-functional combination optimisation problem, and the computational efficiency of the algorithm increases by 97.29% when the complexity of the problem search space increases, while CGWO improves 65.97% and 81.25% respectively in the accuracy of optimisation compared to the prototype of the algorithm (GWO), and has a stable optimisation performance, aspect. It proves that the research in this paper has a high advantage in automatically searching for the best QoS for the microservice combination problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据