4.7 Article

Multi-surface and bounding surface models in hyperplasticity

期刊

COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105143

关键词

Bounding surface; Hyperplasticity; Plasticity; Yield

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We develop a series of models of the bounding surface type within the context of hyperplasticity theory, in which models are completely defined by the specification of two potentials. We first describe a simple bounding surface type model, based on an equivalent multi-surface model, but with the advantages that (a) only a single yield surface is required and (b) a smooth rather than piecewise linear response is achieved. We then generalise this model in a way that allows it to be calibrated against real data with similar facility to a multi-surface model. Each model is presented in a simple one dimensional form, with generalisations to two dimensions and to a full tensorial form. Finally we give an example of the newly developed model calibrated against a monotonic test, and present comparisons with one-way and two way cycling and two complex bi-directional tests.
We develop a series of models of the bounding surface type within the context of hyperplasticity theory, in which models are completely defined by the specification of two potentials. We first describe a simple bounding surface type model, based on an equivalent multi-surface model, but with the advantages that (a) only a single yield surface is required and (b) a smooth rather than piecewise linear response is achieved. We then generalise this model in a way that allows it to be calibrated against real data with similar facility to a multi-surface model. Each model is presented in a simple one dimensional form, with generalisations to two dimensions and to a full tensorial form. Finally we give an example of the newly developed model calibrated against a monotonic test, and present comparisons with one-way and two way cycling and two complex bi-directional tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据