4.5 Article

Secure authentication protocol for home area network in smart grid-based smart cities

期刊

COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.108721

关键词

Smart grid; Smart cities; Authentication; Key agreement; Security

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Internet of Things (IoT) enables better solutions for managing reliability and power quality in a smart grid environment, and helps in implementing smart grid measures in smart city development. A lightweight mutual authentication scheme is proposed to provide surveillance to smart meters in the smart grid infrastructure, addressing the resource constraints and security vulnerabilities of the environment. The suggested protocol is analyzed against known security threats and its performance is evaluated to showcase its efficiency.
The Internet of Things (IoT) allows better solutions for managing challenges such as reliability and power quality in a smart grid environment. It also assists in adopting smart grid measures in smart city development. A smart meter in the smart grid environment must securely access services from a service provider via public channels. An adversary can pose several security vulnerabilities as the communication occurs through a public channel. Various researchers recently conducted several research types to determine the most challenging problems with the smart grid. The security features like integrity, authentication, and confidentiality are indispensable requirements of the smart grid environment. On the other hand, different objects like smart meters in the smart grid environment are resource-constrained, posing in designing lightweight security protocols. Hence, we propose a lightweight mutual authentication scheme to offer surveillance to smart meters in smart grid infrastructure. We analyze the suggested protocol against well-known security threats. Finally, we evaluate the performance of the protocol to illustrate its efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据