4.6 Article

Demand response for flat nonlinear MIMO processes using dynamic ramping constraints

期刊

COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 172, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108171

关键词

Demand response; Mixed-integer dynamic optimization; Flatness; Simultaneous scheduling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Volatile electricity prices make demand response attractive for processes that can modulate their production rate. However, scheduling optimization problems often cannot be solved in real time when nonlinear dynamic processes must be scheduled simultaneously with their local multi-energy system. This work extends dynamic ramping constraints to flat multi-input multi-output processes by a coordinate transformation, allowing for a mixed-integer linear formulation that guarantees feasible operation.
Volatile electricity prices make demand response attractive for processes that can modulate their production rate. However, if nonlinear dynamic processes must be scheduled simultaneously with their local multi-energy system, the resulting scheduling optimization problems often cannot be solved in real time. For single-input single-output processes, the problem can be simplified without sacrificing feasibility by dynamic ramping constraints that define a derivative of the production rate as the ramping degree of freedom. In this work, we extend dynamic ramping constraints to flat multi-input multi-output processes by a coordinate transformation that gives the true nonlinear ramping limits. Approximating these ramping limits by piecewise affine functions gives a mixed-integer linear formulation that guarantees feasible operation. As a case study, dynamic ramping constraints are derived for a heated reactor-separator process that is subsequently scheduled simultaneously with its multi-energy system. The dynamic ramping formulation bridges the gap between rigorous process models and simplified process representations for real-time scheduling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据