4.6 Article

Development of a surrogate model of an amine scrubbing digital twin using machine learning methods

期刊

COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108252

关键词

Machine-learning; Surrogate modeling; Digital twin; Amine scrubbing; Design of experiments; Latin hypercube

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advancements in the process industry require more complex simulations and computationally intensive operations. This study developed a surrogate model for an industrial amine scrubbing digital twin, based on a process simulation created in Aspen HYSYS and validated against real process data. The surrogate model relied on an accurate Design of Experiments procedure, using the Latin-Hypercube method and nested domains. Multiple machine learning models were trained and the most accurate one was selected. The resulting surrogate model showed satisfactory performance given the available data.
Advancements in the process industry require building more complex simulations and performing compu-tationally intensive operations like optimization. To overcome the numerical limit of conventional process simulations a surrogate model is a viable strategy. In this work, a surrogate model of an industrial amine scrubbing digital twin has been developed. The surrogate model has been built based on the process simulation created in Aspen HYSYS and validated as a digital twin against real process data collected during a steady-state operation. The surrogate relies on an accurate Design of Experiments procedure. In this case, the Latin-Hypercube method has been chosen and several nested domains have been defined in ranges around the nominal steady state operative condition. Several machine learning models have been trained using cross -validation, and the most accurate has been selected to predict each target. The resulting surrogate model showed a satisfactory performance, given the data available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据