4.7 Article

Design of experiments for the calibration of history-dependent models via deep reinforcement learning and an enhanced Kalman filter

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 95-124

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-023-02335-6

关键词

Experimental design; Deep reinforcement learning; Enhanced Kalman filter; Elastoplasticity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a deep reinforcement learning algorithm for experimental design, using the Kalman filter to measure the information gain. The algorithm allows for rapid online experiments in high-dimensional parametric design space where trial-and-error is not feasible.
Experimental data are often costly to obtain, which makes it difficult to calibrate complex models. For many models an experimental design that produces the best calibration given a limited experimental budget is not obvious. This paper introduces a deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm for design of experiments that maximizes the information gain measured by Kullback-Leibler divergence obtained via the Kalman filter (KF). This combination enables experimental design for rapid online experiments where manual trial-and-error is not feasible in the high-dimensional parametric design space. We formulate possible configurations of experiments as a decision tree and a Markov decision process, where a finite choice of actions is available at each incremental step. Once an action is taken, a variety of measurements are used to update the state of the experiment. This new data leads to a Bayesian update of the parameters by the KF, which is used to enhance the state representation. In contrast to the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency index, which requires additional sampling to test hypotheses for forward predictions, the KF can lower the cost of experiments by directly estimating the values of new data acquired through additional actions. In this work our applications focus on mechanical testing of materials. Numerical experiments with complex, history-dependent models are used to verify the implementation and benchmark the performance of the RL-designed experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据