4.5 Article

Plastic behavior of a nanoporous high-entropy alloy under compression

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 226, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112241

关键词

High entropy alloys; Nanoporous; Compression; Molecular dynamics; Plastic deformation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the plastic behavior of nanoporous high-entropy alloys (HEA) under compression through molecular dynamics simulations. The results reveal that chemical complexity affects dislocation nucleation and twinning activity, leading to accelerated reduction of nanopores.
Nanoporous High-entropy alloys (HEA) have attracted increasing attention in recent years due to their remark-able mechanical properties and their capability as storage devices. However, chemical complexity involves fluctuations in the atomic environment, hindering the analysis of plasticity. Here, we perform molecular dynamics simulations of an equiatomic nanoporous single crystal FeCrNiCuCo HEA under compression to unveil the role of pores in the plastic behavior, including a random sample and a sample with short-range order. These results are compared to a nanoporous single crystal Average Atom (AA) sample with the same topology to assess the effect of chemical complexity. We find that the overall elastic and plastic regimes are similar in all samples, in contrast to previous reports for tensile tests. However, some differences can be distinguished between HEA samples and AA. Chemical complexity in the HEA favors dislocation nucleation and larger twinning activity, leading to a faster reduction of pores as reflected by the increase in relative density and decrease in surface-to-volume ratio. Following machine learning methods, linear vacancy clusters were found in all samples. These clusters exhibited a perfectly linear shape in AA and a less-defined shape in the HEA samples. Thus, our work provides new insights into the effect of chemical complexity and nanopores on the plasticity of HEAs under compression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据