4.7 Article

Facile fabrication of stacked rGO/MoS2 reinforced polyurethane composite foam for effective electromagnetic interference shielding

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107366

关键词

rGO; MoS 2 stacked hybrid; Polyurethane foam; Water vapor induced phase separation (WVIPS); Electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding; Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a unique method of water vapor-induced phase separation is used to prepare a microcellular stucture of stacked rGO/MoS2 reinforced TPU foam. The hydrothermally prepared rGO/MoS2 heterostructure prevents restacking and effectively reinforces the TPU system. The foam shows enhanced shielding performance, excellent wave attenuation, and outstanding absorption effect, as well as improved thermomechanical and tensile properties, making it suitable for practical applications.
Herein, a unique approach of water vapor-induced phase separation is adopted to prepare a microcellular structure of stacked rGO/MoS2 reinforced TPU foam. Hydrothermally prepared rGO/MoS2 heterostructure prevents the restacking of nanosheets and assists in effective reinforcement in TPU system. The specific shielding performance of different concertation of 2D filler-reinforced composite foams is determined in the X-band (8.2-12.4 GHz) frequency range. The 7 wt% rGO/MoS2/TPU foam having a thickness of 3 mm showed total shielding effectiveness of -32 dB, which is 28 % and 166 % higher than 7 wt% rGO and MoS2 reinforced foams. The electric-dipoles and excellent carrier-hopping caused due to stacked-heterostructure and multiple internal reflections due to the microcellular architecture of foam helped in manifesting the maximum wave attenuation (99.9 %) and leads to an outstanding synergistic absorption effect (92 % of SET). Additionally, it improved the thermomechanical and tensile properties of composite foams over rGO and MoS2 reinforced foams, and make them viable for practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据