4.7 Article

Objective and automated calibration of progressive damage models for finite element simulation of fiber reinforced

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 307, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116618

关键词

Finite element analysis; Continuum damage mechanics; Progressive damage simulation; Genetic algorithm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the application of genetic algorithms for the objective and automated calibration of damage models in composite materials. The method is demonstrated to be generally applicable and robust through three case studies involving carbon and glass fiber-reinforced laminates. The load-displacement curves of fracture tests are used to optimize the input parameters of the damage models. The optimized parameters produce accurate and physically meaningful results, as validated in independent load cases and through good correlation with experimental observations.
The determination of suitable input parameters for the computational analysis of progressive damage in composites is mostly based on trial-and-error attempts leading to subjective models with limited general use. This study explores the application of genetic algorithms for an objective and automated calibration of continuum damage models in finite element simulations. The general applicability and robustness are demonstrated in three case studies containing carbon and glass fiber-reinforced laminates subjected to progressive tensile and compressive fracture tests. The load-displacement curves of these fracture tests build the basis for optimizing the input parameters of the damage models. The validation in independent load cases and a good correlation of damage patterns between experimental observations and simulations show that the optimized parameters can produce accurate and physically meaningful results. The optimization process requires up to 250 finite element simulations which is significantly less than comparable data-driven approaches incorporating machine learning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据