4.7 Article

Progressive damage and residual strength of open-hole thin-ply CFRP laminates under tensile fatigue loading

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 314, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116973

关键词

Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); Damage tolerance; Fatigue; Residual strength after fatigue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, open-hole tensile fatigue tests were conducted on carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer laminates using thin-ply prepregs to investigate the effects of varying ply thickness. Fatigue damage growth around a circular hole was evaluated through X-ray radiography, and the effect of fatigue damage on residual strength was assessed through static tensile tests. The results demonstrated that thin-ply laminates can suppress fatigue damage growth and retain residual strength under high-cycle fatigue, confirming their superiority over thick-ply laminates.
Thin-ply composites are promising structural materials because of their excellent damage resistance and fatigue properties, as well as the advantage of improved design freedom in composite structures. In this study, open-hole tensile fatigue tests were performed on carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer laminates using thin-ply prepregs to investigate the effects of varying ply thickness. Fatigue tests were performed on three types of quasi-isotropic laminates with different ply thicknesses (thin-ply, intermediate-ply, and thick-ply) at several stresses. Fatigue damage growth around a circular hole was examined by evaluating stiffness degradation and internal damage using X-ray radiography. Additionally, the fatigued specimens were subjected to static tensile tests to evaluate the effect of fatigue damage on the residual strength after fatigue tests. The thin-ply laminates can suppress fatigue damage growth and retain the residual strength properties under high-cycle fatigue at high stress level, thus validating their superiority over thick-ply laminates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据